VaxGen denies
conflict of interest over $8m grant
assisted by future employee
Documents
obtained in 1999 by Brian Deer during his Sunday
Times investigation, The VaxGen
Experiment,of California Aids vaccine
company, VaxGen Inc, resulted in federal
prosection of Dr William Heyward, who as
HIV vaccine chief at the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention cheer-led
for VaxGen's technology and arranged $8m
in grants for its controversial product
whilst secretly engaged to join the
company. This is the company's reply to a
report in The Chicago Tribune of February
17 2000 by staff writer Jeremy Manier
On
February 24 2003, it was announced that a
US phase III trial had failed to show
efficacy for AidsVax
From Nicole
Lynch, VaxGen
In response to Jeremy
Manier's "Possible conflict seen
in grant on HIV vaccine tests,"
Dr. Donald P. Francis, president of
VaxGen Inc., has pointed out some
misperceptions contained in the
story.
None of the $8m research
grant from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention goes directly
to VaxGen. All money involved in the
collaboration goes directly to six of
the 61 clinical research centers
involved in the Phase III trial over
a four-year period [see note below].
Dr William Heyward did
not authorize the $8m grant. He was a
participant in the discussions about
the collaboration and a member of a
team that made the decision.
The president of the
United States has called for
government and industry to work
together on AIDS vaccine development.
The value in this collaboration is in
working with CDC. The information
that will be gained will be
invaluable for speeding the
development of an HIV vaccine.
VaxGen Inc. vehemently
denies any allegations of a conflict
of interest in its collaboration with
the CDC.
[Note] In VaxGen's initial public
offering prospectus, dated June 1999, the
company tells investors (page 20):
"We anticipate receiving an
aggregate of approximately $12,600,000
from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the National Institutes
for Allergy and Infectious Diseases
commencing in September 1999. We believe
these funds will enable us to meet
anticipated operating expenditures for an
additional year."
|