VaxGen
denies conflict of interest over $8m grant
assisted by future employee
Documents
obtained in 1999 by Brian Deer during his Sunday Times
investigation, The VaxGen Experiment,of California Aids
vaccine company, VaxGen Inc, resulted in federal
prosection of Dr William Heyward, who as HIV
vaccine chief at the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention cheer-led for VaxGen's technology
and arranged $8m in grants for its controversial
product whilst secretly engaged to join the
company. This is the company's reply to a report
in The Chicago Tribune of February 17 2000 by
staff writer Jeremy Manier
On February 24
2003, it was announced that a US phase III trial
had failed to show efficacy for AidsVax
From Nicole Lynch,
VaxGen
In response to Jeremy Manier's
"Possible conflict seen in grant on HIV
vaccine tests," Dr. Donald P. Francis,
president of VaxGen Inc., has pointed out
some misperceptions contained in the story.
None of the $8m research grant
from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention goes directly to VaxGen. All money
involved in the collaboration goes directly
to six of the 61 clinical research centers
involved in the Phase III trial over a
four-year period [see note below].
Dr William Heyward did not
authorize the $8m grant. He was a participant
in the discussions about the collaboration
and a member of a team that made the
decision.
The president of the United
States has called for government and industry
to work together on AIDS vaccine development.
The value in this collaboration is in working
with CDC. The information that will be gained
will be invaluable for speeding the
development of an HIV vaccine.
VaxGen Inc. vehemently denies
any allegations of a conflict of interest in
its collaboration with the CDC.
[Note] In VaxGen's initial
public offering prospectus, dated June 1999, the
company tells investors (page 20): "We
anticipate receiving an aggregate of
approximately $12,600,000 from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention and the National
Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Diseases
commencing in September 1999. We believe these
funds will enable us to meet anticipated
operating expenditures for an additional
year."
|