| briandeer.com | VIOXX: THE UK CONNECTION


Vioxx papers question who knew what, and when, over dangers of Merck's painkiller

Heart death painkiller research defended

"Merck acted responsibly and appropriately as it developed and marketed Vioxx. From the beginning of the clinical development program for Vioxx, Merck conducted well- controlled randomized clinical trials, which we believe are the best way to examine and establish the safety and efficacy of a drug. The results of these studies have been published in peer- reviewed major medical journals and reviewed at two public FDA Advisory Comm- ittee Meetings. We are confident in our research and in how Merck has communicated about Vioxx since its approval to this day.

"When questions arose about the safety of Vioxx, Merck took steps to investigate and address these issues. The Company worked diligently with FDA and the regulatory authorities in other countries to ensure that the safety profile of Vioxx was reflected appropriately in the prescrib- ing information. Merck believed that the prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials that we undertook would provide the data to further evaluate the cardiovascular profile of Vioxx. It was precisely in this type of study, the APPROVe trial, in which, for the first time, there was an increased risk of confirmed cardio- vascular events beginning after 18 months of treatment in patients taking Vioxx compared to those taking placebo. Within one week of learning those results, Merck acted in what it believed was the best interest of patients and voluntarily withdrew Vioxx from the market."

- Merck UK statement, issued November 4 2004

*****

"I believe strongly in the need for research to improve the quality of patient care, and have dedicated much of my professional life to this goal, whilst striving to bring a bal- anced and objective viewpoint to my work."

- Statement by Professor Michael Langman, August 4 2005

*****

"The Victor study is run to the highest ethical and scientific standards."

- Statement by Professor David J Kerr, CBE, August 5 2005

*****

You can contact Brian Deer via this website, which updates in the light of Vioxx developments.

On September 30 2004, the New Jersey-based drug giant, Merck Inc, abruptly withdrew its flagship blockbuster Vioxx, citing information, that it said was new, suggesting that the anti-inflammatory painkiller was linked with an epidemic of heart attacks. But how long was it clear, and to to whom was it clear, that moneyspinner Vioxx - known generically as rofecoxib - may pose serious risks?

This page indexes reports and documents posted at this website from an investigation in 2005 by Brian Deer for The Sunday Times of London into the previously unreported UK Vioxx connection

This page updates - please check back Page last modified: July 26, 2008

Brian Deer's Sunday Times investigation into Vioxx - the UK connection - August 2005
 
21.08.05: Vioxx death toll may hit 2,000 in UK
21.08.05: Victims of drug that took a hidden toll
13.02.05: Withdrawn painkiller linked to hundreds of deaths in UK

Unpublished reports from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
 
12.06.00: Report considered by the Committee on Safety of Medicines
12.12.01: Report considered by the Committee on Safety of Medicines
24.09.02: Report considered by Sub-Committee on Pharmacovigilance
29.04.03: Report considered by Sub-Committee on Pharmacovigilance
10.09.03: Report considered by the Committee on Safety of Medicines

Death on trial: Kenneth Wood and the "Victor" project, testing Vioxx to block cancer

22.05.02: Victor informed consent papers signed by Kenneth Wood
29.10.04: Merck suspected adverse reaction report re Kenneth Wood

Were risks of ulcers, perforations and bleeding played down by "Victor" investigators?

24.10.01: Ethics committee alert over non-disclosure of GI risks

The UK "Victor" trial of Vioxx: evolution of approved informed consent documents

07.12.00: Trial design keeps from patients risks revealed to doctors
30.07.02: Victor informed consent papers substantially amended
06.09.04: No heart risks in warnings three weeks before Vioxx pulled

Statements by Victor trial principal investigators in reply to Brian Deer's inquiries
 
04.08.05: Professor Michael Langman responds to Brian Deer
05.08.05: Professor David Kerr responds to Brian Deer

United States Vioxx labels approved by the Food and Drug Administration [pdfs]
 
00.05.99: Approval label with strong gastrointestinal warnings
00.04.02: Label introduces cardiovascular concerns

European Union: Summary of Product Characteristics for rofecoxib

00.11.01: Legal statement of Vioxx's recognised risks and benefits







Vioxx: the UK connection | briandeer.com |