|
|
BRIAN
DEER: MATTHEW AND THE BURGER BUG Page 1
The
Sunday Times Magazine, May 17 1998
By
Brian Deer
Matthew
Bell lay on the sofa in the front room of his
home and snuggled against a cushion half as big
as himself as he gazed at Batman Forever on
video. He was crazy about superheroes in serious
outfits - Batman, Spiderman, Fireman Sam - and
cut quite a figure himself as a blond-haired
Superman at his local toddlers' group in
Torrisholme, Morecambe. But on this Monday
afternoon - it was nearly 4pm - his attention to
the movie faltered. He had started to feel odd
sometime earlier in the day, and now he had a
pain in his tummy. Matthew grasped the cushion in
a vain search for comfort, and wished the hurting
would go away.
His
mother, Rachael, was in the kitchen next door,
grilling fish fingers for tea. As she laid out
three plates, her youngest son, Tom, trotted
between the rooms. It had been an exhausting day,
like every day for this lone mother with two
small children. On Friday, they had been for
milkshakes at Brucciani ice cream parlour on the
Morecambe promenade. On Saturday, Stuart, the
boys' father, a painter and decorator, had come
over and taken them all to McDonald's. Yesterday,
they had played at a sea-front sandpit. And today
they picked apples at an allotment. When Matthew
complained, "Mam, my belly hurts," it
seemed like just another routine stress.
Had
Rachael known then what she found out later, she
would have been terrified. Matthew, three years
and nine months old, was showing the first
symptoms of infection with the same kind of
E-coli organism that is currently the subject of
an inquiry in Scotland, after an outbreak in
November 1996 traced to a Lanarkshire butcher's
shop killed 21 people. As that Monday afternoon
turned to evening, vicious toxins produced by the
bug stuck to and attacked her child's gut. He
started to suffer from diarrhoea and agonising
stomach cramps. And he would soon become
seriously ill.
A
full explanation of what was happening to Matthew
is still beyond medical science. The particular
variety of the Escherichia coli bug that he had
picked up - called O157:H7 - is a freak mutation
of a normally harmless germ, and only surfaced in
the 1980s. Despite a string of devastating
outbreaks around the world, it never used to be
thought to be a big enough threat to be worthy of
major research. But last year the number of
laboratory-confirmed infections in Britain
suddenly jumped by 80%, to more than 1,500 cases,
and experts are now alarmed. "It may have
peaked," says Hugh Pennington, professor of
bacteriology at Aberdeen University and the
government's chief adviser on the subject.
"But it may get 10 times worse."
No
parent thinks of killer epidemics when their
child has a stomach upset. On that afternoon,
last September, Rachael, 32, thought that Matthew
just needed a rest and would soon be up and
about. She was not, in any case, the type to
bother doctors or elbow her way to the front of
hospital queues. Until she stopped work to look
after the boys she had been a quality checker in
a local factory which made toilet seats, cooker
handles and switches. Her response was the same
as that of young mothers' everywhere: she gave
Matthew Calpol, a junior paracetamol, and waited
for his tummy ache to pass.
Her
son, too, was not a complainer. Despite being
less than four years old, he had somehow assumed
a prematurely adult role in their two-storey
end-of-terrace house, opposite the post office on
Lancaster Road. He had even been in on the birth
of his brother, Tom, who was 19 months his
junior. At night the boys shared an attic room
and they played together every day. But he barely
slept on that Monday night and on Tuesday he was
again on the sofa. His mother was watchful and
his brother was confused. But Matthew was
hero-brave.
By
Wednesday, it seemed to Rachael that he had more
than a stomach upset. Matthew's diarrhoea now
contained traces of blood, which was being shed
from his gut as the poison from the bug caused
the lining to ulcerate and swell. She called the
night doctor, who came at 3am. He was a young,
dark-haired Lancashire man. He examined the child
and ruled out appendicitis. Without tests he
could not tell her more.
"If
it gets any worse, you should phone me," he
advised her. Then he left on his out-of-hours
round.
When
she looked back later, Rachael felt that he had
failed her. But most doctors would have acted no
differently. Despite the growing number of
high-profile food-poisoning reports - especially
the Lanarkshire outbreak, which affected 400
people - and sporadic cases of sickness, brain
damage and even death, few general
practitioners have ever seen a case or learnt to
spot the danger signs. There are plenty of other
causes of diarrhoea, moreover, such as salmonella
and campylobacter, which (at 6500 and 56,000
reported cases last year) swamp infections by the
new E-coli.
North
Lancashire's doctors were especially backward in
their readiness to deal with the problem. Because
the organism is still only gaining a foothold, it
has a remarkably patchy distribution of infection
- many some places, few in others. Scotland, for
instance, has more cases than England, with the
east more affected than the west. Canada is worse
hit than the United States, with its west
suffering more than its east. There had recently
been a small outbreak 20 miles south of Morecambe
in Garstang, traced to unpasteurised cheese, and
another during 1991, linked to a McDonald's
restaurant in Preston, but there was no sense of
any local alert.
By
Thursday, however, Rachael had seen enough and
Stuart drove them over to the Royal Lancaster
Infirmary, where they went to the emergency
department. The blood in Matthew's diarrhoea was
worse than before and now he was now vomiting up
anything he ate or drank. He looked pale and
tired from lack of sleep and nutrition, but still
he made little fuss. He was taken to the
paediatric ward, ward 34, on the ground floor of
the main hospital building. A consultant examined
him and nurse took a stool sample to be tested in
the hospital laboratory.
Rachael
was told that the test would take days. At 5pm
that Thursday, it was judged that nothing more
could be done at the hospital, and Matthew was
discharged. Rachael was told the problem was
gastro-enteritis, and given a patient information
leaflet. "This is a common infection in
childhood which causes diarrhoea," it
explained. "There is often some vomiting as
well. Most children will recover by 4-5 days, but
sometimes it takes two weeks until everything is
back to normal."
She
was reassured, as any mother would be. But on
Saturday morning - day 6 of Matthew's illness -
she took him to see her GP. The boy now had a
yellow tinge in his eyes, said that his back hurt
and that his "wee won't come down".
Also by now he was beginning to complain that he
was feeling very sick. "Why can't the doctor
make me better," he kept saying, when again
they were told that there was no treatment for
his condition, and he had returned to the sofa at
home.
The
following day, Sunday, Rachael phoned the
hospital for the findings of the laboratory test.
"We've had the result back this
morning," a nurse told her. "It is
E-coli O157."
Rachael
was shocked. She had heard of E-coli. She had
seen it on television. "That was what they
had in Scotland," she said, now alarmed.
"What should I do?"
But
although young children with E-coli are at the
greatest risk of complications from the
infection, the nurse had been given no guidance
on any action and couldn't offer any advice.
"It doesn't mean a lot to me," is how
Rachael recalls the nurse's response.
*****
This
report is copyright, Brian Deer. Responses,
information and other feedback concerning this
resource on e-coli o157 food poisoning are
appreciated - via the briandeer.com homepage.
|
|