|
|
| |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
Last page |
BRIAN
DEER: NATURE'S PREY Page 5
The
tree of our species has many thousands of
branches, almost all of which withered and died.
To date, palaeontologists have invented countless
names for the bone fragments they have pulled
from the ground: Homo habilis, Zinjanthropus,
Rampithecus, to name but three more.
Primatologists, meanwhile, take our origins back
past the bonobo, to squirrels and beyond. So, why
pick the emergence of Homo erectus from
Australopithecus as due any special note? Is
there anything, moreover, to be learnt from our
ancestors of more than 80,000 generations ago?
"There
is a current trend to try to find the origins of
the human mind on the Pleistocene savannah,"
the dental expert Walker cautioned me. "And
I have this perennial question: why then? Why not
go back to a fish ancestor, or your grandmother,
or a few generations ago. Why pick that as the
ancestral thing you are interested in?"
The
answer, I suppose, is the speed of the change and
the depth of the impact it produced. When Emma
Mbua, curator of hominids at the Nairobi museum,
showed me a selection of famous skulls, I could
see straight away that Homo erectus represented a
quantum jump. And measured on the clock of
evolution, the 200,000 years or so that it spent
diverging from its predecessor was so rapid that
it almost makes you want to talk about the day
we came down from the trees.
Bones,
however, have little to say about the way that
their owners behaved - allowing images to be
conjured about them that are driven by more
recent preoccupations. All of the
Australopithecus finds have been in Africa (the
latest in Chad) and, until Homo erectus specimens
turned up in Asia, fossils were exclusively
retrieved by white adventurers in some past or
actual European colony. Dart, an Australian
working in Johannesburg, made his name during
apartheid's construction. The Leakeys have been
prime exponents of white settlers controlling the
sites. Even American expeditions in Ethiopia have
had a peculiarly imperialist feel.
The
killer ape narrative appealed to such folk, for
whom the most sophisticated scientific techniques
were deployed on fixing their beloved Land
Rovers. It was almost as if through palaeontology
they felt they could prove objectively that their
kind's supremacy was historically preordained. If
old Australopithecus murdered his way out of the
trees, it could be argued, how natural and
welcome is civilisation's advance to the polite
domination of today? Look at the ever-collapsing
states of modern Africa, moreover, and you might
well be drawn by theories, written in stone, that
we were killers before we were cooks.
It
was Ardrey, once more, who got polished the final
draft - and in whose footsteps I might literally
have trodden. The fossil hunters and zoologists
were like two "wings" of a
"revolution", he wrote, which
dovetailed into a third: "The African
independence movements are rapidly converting a
continent into something approaching a political
state of nature, where primitive human behaviour
may be observed not as we should wish it to be,
but as it is."
Attitudes
are changing, however, and science mirrors that.
In the same cultural shifts that see aboriginal
peoples probed for ancient wisdoms, so Homo
erectus is being rehabilitated as something more
than a beast. While lonely skulls and stone tools
once stressed individualism, large-scale land
surveys and evidence of fire now point to the
community of life. And we now see that it was not
aggression, but fear which
dominated our earliest lives. Fear - the
emotion which vicariously excites the readers of
thrillers, and which a philosopher might see as
the source of all human evil - is the default
emotion of our evolutionary line. It just never
went away.
That
archaeology and other sciences should now offer
us such notions, may say as much about the
changing concerns of Homo sapiens as of those of
our ancient forebears. Hardly more than a
generation ago, in the heady euphoria of the
booming 1960s, the image of the times was the
ultimate weapon: the mushrooming nuclear bomb. In
the pessimistic, economically fragile 1990s,
another image is taking hold in our collective
mind: the secure, life-giving tree.
As
our planet's atmosphere sours, as once it did for
other reasons, and the last tatters of the
primeval forest are threatened with destruction,
maybe we see something of our present predicament
in the melancholy, scavenging way of life that
science now presents for Australopithecus and
Homo. "Humans are losing confidence,"
Robert Foley, director of the Duckworth
Laboratory at Cambridge University, pointed out
to me. "We have started to see ourselves as
the victims, rather than the masters, of
nature."
I
think some sense of that loss was weighing on me
when I drove on the plain that Sunday. Our
origins, of course, is a story of victors, which
at least some lucky bands of Homo erectus must
have numbered among. But my emotion - if you
will, a vibration - was at one with all those
branches of our evolutionary tree that shrivelled
so long ago. In the fickle, shifting, African
mosaic, there were always more losers than
winners. Some perished when their rivers turned
to mud and then dust. Others were caught by cats.
Some were too hairy to stay cool in the day. Some
so brainless they simply got lost.
From
the wheel of my red Hyundai, I looked across the
yellow savannah that afternoon and felt for a
moment that I was seeing this landscape as one of
these hominids might have done. I wondered if,
two million years ago, as the nutritious,
protective forest dwindled to islands in the
grass, maybe he and his band had made a break
from a patch of wilting, fruitless trees.
Thirsty, hungry, confused and frightened, they
had set off for the empty horizon in search of a
new source of food and shade.
But
they had started too late, had found no water and
as the sun rose above them, they had slumped,
defeated, in the merciless tropical heat.
They
never fell victim to killer apes. Like us, they
were nature's prey.
This
report is copyright, Brian Deer. Responses,
information and other feedback concerning this
resource homo erectus and the origins of the
human species are appreciated - via the briandeer.com homepage.
|
|