Medical school
"entirely satisfied" over
ethical scrutiny of Wakefield research
This page
is research from an award-winning investigation, concluding in
2011, by Brian Deer for The Sunday
Times of London into a campaign linking
the MMR children's
vaccine with autism based on fraudulent
research by British former doctor Andrew
Wakefield
This
statement, by Professor Humphrey Hodgson
of the Royal Free hospital's medical
school, was issued through the Lancet
medical journal on February 20 2004, when
the journal's editor, Dr Richard Horton, press-released
content from a confidential meeting with
Brian Deer for The Sunday Times. This
statement is posted for information only.
Deer cannot here confirm any part as
accurate
A STATEMENT
BY THE ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL AND THE ROYAL
FREE HAMPSTEAD NHS TRUST
We
are entirely satisfied that the
investigations performed on the
children reported in the Lancet
paper had been subjected to
appropriate and rigorous ethical
scrutiny. Because the nature of the
condition affecting child behaviour
and gastroenterological symptoms was
unknown and required elucidation, the
investigation of these children was
properly submitted to and fully
discussed by the Ethical Practices
Committee at the Royal Free Hampstead
in 1996. Specifically, that committee
was a sub-committee of the then
Camden and Islington Health Authority
Research Ethics Committee
(subsequently incorporated into the
new Central Office for Research
Ethics Committee arrangements) whose
decisions were independent of the
university and hospital. The
committee, after clarifying a number
of issues including that the
childrens investigations were
defined by the clinical
symptomatology and diagnostic
requirements, and having taken expert
advice, approved the protocol
submitted.
The
clinical management and investigation
of these children was performed at
the Free by a dedicated team of
consultant paediatric
gastroenterologists, in full
consultation with and agreement of
the parents of the affected children.
The investigations were those thought
appropriate in the light of the
severity of the childrens
symptoms according to the
clinicians judgment at the
time.
Had
the advice of the Institutions been
sought at the time concerning
conflict of interest, they would
undoubtedly have advised that any
potential conflict should be
declared, so that others could judge
whether such conflicts were real.
Professor Humphrey
Hodgson
Vice-Dean and campus
director, Royal Free and University
College Medical School
|