Crohn's and
colitis numbers vary sharply in papers
drawing on the same UK survey
This page
is research from an investigation by Brian Deer for The Sunday
Times of London and the UK's Channel 4
Television into a campaign linking the MMR
children's vaccine with autism.
| Go to part I: The Lancet scandal | Go to
part II: The Wakefield
factor
The table
here compares data from abstracts and
papers by Scott Montgomery, Andrew Wakefield, et al,
apparently derived from the same survey:
"BCS70", which reported on all
those living in England, Scotland and
Wales born between April 5 and 11 1970,
of which 13,099 were mailed in 1995/6.
The abstracts [1] were identical
250-word texts from Gut
and Gastroenterology
supplements. The papers were from [2] the British
Medical Journal; [3] Gastroenterology;
and [4] the American
Journal of Gastroenterology
The
Wakefield group's commission to the BCS70
organisers was to extract data on the
numbers of respondents who, in 1995/6,
said they suffered from the inflammatory
bowel diseases [IBDs], Crohn's and
ulcerative colitis. Cases were confirmed
with physicians (and for the abstracts
reportedly also by histopathology), and
in [1] - [3] unconfirmed cases
excluded. But as this table shows, the
numbers vary - and sharply in the
Gastroenterology figures, cited later by
Wakefield as a key part of the
justification for his MMR crusade
- = data
not reported |
Abstracts
[Note
1]
|
Brit
Med J
[Note
2]
|
Gastro'ology
[Note
3]
|
Am J
Gastroenterology
[Note
4]
|
| Publication
date |
Mar/May 1997 |
Apr 4 1998 |
Apr 1999 |
Dec 2000 |
| Date accepted |
- |
Nov 21 1997 |
Dec 29 1998 |
Jun 5 2000 |
Survey
respondents
(of 13,099 asked) |
9800
-> |
9803
-> |
9803
-> |
|
No. replies
used
for analysis |
9800
-> |
9803
->
unchanged |
7019
-> down 28.4% |
9757
|
[4a]
7616 |
[4b]
7319 |
[4c]
4430 |
[4d]
11 |
|
| Reported
Crohn's disease cases |
- |
32
-> |
-
-> |
|
| Confirmed
Crohn's disease cases |
24
-> |
21
->
down 12.5% |
20
->
down 4.8% |
|
| Reported
ulcerative colitis cases |
- |
27
-> |
-
-> |
|
| Confirmed
ulcerative colitis cases |
20
-> |
12
->
down 40% |
17
->
up 41% |
|
[Note 1]
Abstracts. Two identical 250-word
abstracts were presented by the Wakefield
group in the spring of 1997, described as
based on the BCS70 survey: first in the
printed programme of a meeting of the
British Society of Gastroenterology
(Gut); second in a programme for a
meeting of the American
Gastroenterological Association
(Gastroenterology). These abstracts
report the highest numbers for confirmed
IBDs from the BCS70 cohort. The
confirmations of subjects' reports are
stated in the abstracts to be by
reference to the subjects' physicians,
and also by histopathology. These figures
should presumably be taken, therefore, to
be very accurate and authoritative.
However, no subsequent paper in the
series here reports the same high
numbers, nor makes claims of laboratory
confirmation. March 18-21 1997,
Brighton, and May 11-14 1997, Washington
DC.
[Note 2]
British Medical Journal. This paper
simply sets out the methodology of BCS70,
explains confirmation proceedures with
doctors (to which later papers refer),
and performs calculations on what is said
to be the prevalence of IBD in this
cohort. The paper says that there is a
"lack of significant association of
both social class and sex with
inflammatory bowel disease," but
explains that this "may be a
function of the small number of
cases". Prevalence of
inflammatory bowel disease in British 26
year olds: national longitudinal birth
cohort.
[Note 3]
Gastroenterology. The
Gastroenterology paper was cited in 2005
by Andrew Wakefield in justification of
his 1998 call for replacing MMR with
single vaccines administered at 12-month
intervals, to prevent autism. The BCS70
cohort passed through childhood before
MMR was introduced to the UK in 1988, so
there is no direct relevance. Moreover,
analysis of the survey data in this paper
found no link between inflammatory bowel
disease and either prior measles
infection or vaccination, contradicting
his core theory, which was that measles
virus caused IBD and at least some forms
of autism.
Nevertheless,
Wakefield claimed that the
Gastroenterology paper reports findings
upon which he based his call for the
British government to "suspend"
MMR. Relevance is mined from just three
cases of Crohn's and four
cases of ulcerative colitis where the
respondent had apparently previously had natural,
or "wild", measles
and mumps infection
within the same year of life
(eg age 3). This was judged by parental
recall when the respondent was 10,
and must be presumed to be potentially
very unreliable, given the nature of the
means of gathering this information (with
local health visitors asking mothers a
multitude of questions, up to perhaps
eight years later), and a lack of
precision surrounding the clinical
symptoms and signs of measles. The
authors nevertheless claim statistical
significance for this tenuous,
convoluted, subgroup analysis of 0.044
(Crohn's) and 0.004 (UC), and combine
them to claim 0.001 for IBD. No
compensation is allowed for multiple
subgroup analyses. Of course, IBD has
never been shown to have any relationship
to autism, which isn't mentioned in any
of this series of papers.
A
total of 2784
questionnaires were excluded from the
total received. The Gastroenterology
paper, which is essentially a collection
of retrospective subgroup analyses, such
as "mumps infection before
age 2 years" and "measles
and mumps infection in the same year of
life", explains:
"After exclusion of cohort members
with missing data for the key variables
required by these analyses, the number of
cohort members was 7019."
The
authors say: "Despite the relatively
small number of cohort members with IBD
at age 26 years, the quality of these
unique data may provide us with an
unparalleled insight into the etiology of
ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.
BCS70 is one of the few sources that can
provide detailed, reliable, and unbiased
information about childhood infections in
patients with adult-onset IBD."
Material
relating to this paper, and apparently to
the conference abstracts above, was
considered by a special panel of the UK Medical
Research Council in March 1998. The
minutes report the following conclusion,
among others: "The study suggested
that there might be a small proportion of
IBD cases related in some way to exposure
to two paramyxovirus infections within
the same year. However, the relationship
would only be valid if it were assumed
that there had been no selection bias, no
recall bias, no prior undiagnosed health
problems amongst the group identified,
and that misdiagnosis of infection or gut
condition had not occurred." Oddly,
IBD numbers, again, appear to be
different to those given in the abstracts
and papers in the table above. According
to the minutes, the Wakefield group
reported only 15 cases
of Crohn's disease from the BCS70 cohort,
which can't be reconciled with anything
in the published papers. As to the
fragility of the data, the minutes note
with regard to Crohn's disease: "It
was suggested that if one case was
changed, all statistical significance
would be lost." The panel concluded:
"In summary, there was currently no
evidence relating measles vaccine or MMR
to inflammatory bowel disease." Paramyxovirus
infections in childhood and subsequent
inflammatory bowel disease.
[Note 4]
American Journal of Gastroenterology. The apparent
loss of 46 survey
respondents in this paper, compared with
the previous ones, isn't explained. Nor
is it clear whether this explains a fall
of two reported cases of
Crohn's disease and five
cases of ulcerative colitis - which
together would mean that seven
of the "missing" 46
had IBD (15%). Unlike
the conference abstracts, and the BMJ and
Gastroenterology papers, which base
calculations on physician-confirmed
cases of IBD, this paper uses figures for
unconfirmed,
patient-reported, cases. Confirmed case
data for the paper's various calculations
aren't shown, other than to state the
same overall confirmed figures as in the
BMJ paper. The reason for this change in
the methodology isn't explained, although
the paper states that - despite the
numbers worked with being very small
indeed - the results wouldn't be
"significantly" different if
the calculations had been performed on
confirmed cases of IBD, as in previous
papers in this series.
[4a] The total of
9757 apparent respondents to the survey
are whittled down for the first important
calculation to 7616, who are those
subjects reported as having complete
vaccination data available.
[4b] The total
used for analysis is whittled down again
by introducing the concept of "potential
confounding factors", which
are described as "sex,
social class at birth and crowding in
childhood". Those for whom
this data was said to be incomplete were
excluded from analysis, bringing the
analysed cohort down to 7319.
[4c] To perform
the calculations, the number of subjects
reported to have been vaccinated in
childhood against measles are recorded as
4430 (in the text) or 4431
(in a table). Despite all this effort,
relating the numbers with IBD to the
numbers vaccinated, which was the aim of
the project, is said to have produced no
statistically significant association.
[4d] Statistical
significance, however, is
claimed - including in this paper's
opening abstract - for a
"statistically significant trend (p=0.040)
with increasing age of measles
vaccination for risk of Crohn's
disease." This claim, squeezed from
the data, is based on only 11
cases of Crohn's, eight
of whom are reported to have been
vaccinated before they were two, and one
each reported to have been
vaccinated at two, three and four years
old. Measles vaccination and
inflammatory bowel disease: a national
British cohort study.
Possible
conclusion. Findings from
this series of papers - one of which [3] was used in 2005
by Wakefield to justify his call for
single shots, administered at 12-month
intervals to prevent autism - are within
the margin of possible error from
variations in the overall cohort and in
the numbers recorded as having
self-reported, or physician- (and
histopathologically-) confirmed,
inflammatory bowel disease. In a number
of instances, data apparently pointing,
weakly, to possible links between
infections or vaccinations and subsequent
disease, appears to have been forced
beyond the point at which the authors
might reasonably have concluded that it's
as likely to confuse as to illuminate.
Analysis in
progress. Any amendments or
corrections are very welcome. Please contact
Brian Deer through this
website. Thanks
|